The inspiration for the 1994 and the cohesion of the majority :" I would look at the events of the current legislature to try to interpret them according to considerations not quotas. What happened as we well know, the reason is not so clear. The center-right won the elections by a large margin, thanks to the peculiarities of the electoral law, the majority was composed of two parties, and PDL League, agree on the program, despite this, after just two years, the majority was not disrupted has failed because the agreement with the league but that the PDL has been torn by one, albeit small, spin-off. The question becomes: what guarantees the cohesion of the majority or the conditions under which disruptive forces are prevailing?
A majority, no matter if it is made by one or more parties, can be cohesive or for positive reasons - because all within it share the program and are committed to achieve it - or for negative reasons, when the opposition is united, authoritative and aggressive is the prevailing spirit of conservation: if the government fails, the opposition will take over place. Neither of these reasons cohesion has worked in this legislature. Evidently, the splitting of the PDL did not agree to fund the program that they had agreed before the election, or had come to the conclusion that it could or should be done. On the other hand, a divided minority, noisy but inconclusive, it represents a credible alternative: the possibility that it may replace the current appeared Remote and I do not think that it is less after the last events. For
reviving, albeit small, majority survived the defection of the Futurists, they can not rely on fear of influential opposition, that there continues to be, we need to focus on the positives of aggregation: to work hard to achieve one or more points in the program that are likely to join those who support the government and to divide those who are fighting. The waste must be that of qualifying and high-profile targets, which glaze return to action of the government and laying bare the weakness of the opposition.
Giuliano Ferrara is fighting a major battle to convince Berlusconi to recover the inspiration of 1994 and involved me, asking me to make them the subject of an article for the paper, which I did very willingly. Speaking to "call" on Channel 5, Berlusconi (February 14) responds to that of Ferrara: "the spirit of '94 I've never lost, but in the center in recent years there have been many brakeman to from Fini and Casini. And so I'm sure that from now on, after the diaspora of Fini, backed up by a majority that is so small but certainly more cohesive than before, we will be able to complete the liberal revolution that we follow the '94 and that the Italians want to very strongly .
I would be tempted to say that he could not be said more clearly: the center-right has won three elections with the same program, it is therefore clear that the majority of Italians can be recognized in those ideas. In '94 the turnaround in 2001-06 del'Udc the filibuster on the tax reform and National Alliance on that of justice, now the defection futurist have so far prevented the Italians want to achieve. Berlusconi is right: we are so few, but if anyone remer against and realize even the reform of taxation and justice, they spent nearly two decades will not be in vain.
Antonio Martino, February 14, 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment